Three stories about where education is going

Three different education stories have stuck in my mind this weekend.  They have nothing to do with each other directly – two are very different publications, and one is from me – yet combined they point to some ways higher education is developing.   Themes include class, finance, gender, and race.

1. Two young women strive to complete undergraduate degrees, in the face of poverty, homelessness, and exhaustion, in this California Sunday account.  It’s a deep dive into two lives, illustrating with examples a major segment of American higher education.  Note the role of the California State University system in teaching and supporting poor learners.

It’s classic Sara Goldrick-Rab (here’s our Forum discussion with her) material, too:

At Cal State Long Beach, Kersheral’s tuition and fees ran close to $6,500 a year, but they were covered. In fact, more than half of California college students don’t need to worry about tuition — various federal and state grants and waivers pick up the tab. The problem is the cost of everything else. Two-thirds of the expense of attending a public four-year college stems from costs like rent, food, and books.

"Kersheral leaving Food 4 Less with her groceries"

2. The Economist reminds us (Medium registration required) that higher education is a fine site for assortative mating.  That is, people tend to partner with people with whom they share certain characteristics – in this case, high levels of academic achievement.  This is also increasing: “the authors conclude that Americans born in 1972 do indeed have a stronger preference for better-educated partners than those born in 1943.”

They cite a recent paper by Pierre-André Chiappori, Bernard Salanié, and Yoram Weiss, “Partner Choice, Investment in Children, and the Marital College Premium” (paywalled), which finds that “preference for partners of the same education has significantly increased for white individuals, particularly for the highly educated”.  Once more we see education and privilege acting as a feedback loop to reinforce if not expand inequality.

There’s an interesting racial aspect to this paper: “We find no evidence of such an increase for black individuals. ”

There’s also an interesting gender aspect: “we find that the “marital college-plus premium” has increased for women but not for men.

3. Earlier this year I spoke to a group of American academics.  Never mind where or whom.  Readers know that I speak with a lot of educators.  At one point I explained the size of the combined student loan debt, linking it to state governments reducing their support of public colleges and universities. I do this wherever I go.  Often I ask academic audiences to raise their hands if they are still paying off loans.  As the inevitable forest of hands goes up, I notice the faces of those not paying off debt.  Always a number are shocked and amazed, especially people from older generations.

This time I noticed one older (way beyond 65) professor quietly fume at this part of my presentation.  At last he spoke up.  “Students only take out loans because they want to use the money for a better lifestyle!  They don’t have to do this!”  I wasn’t quite sure what this meant, and he rapidly continued: “They spend the money on lavish furniture! and vacations!”  Reactions from other academics were… interesting.

Liked it? Take a second to support Bryan Alexander on Patreon!
This entry was posted in research topics, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Three stories about where education is going

  1. actualham says:

    “Lavish furniture.” I really can’t. even.

  2. bbenzon says:

    You know, Bryan, I remember conversations from back in the 1970s where faculty then clearly saw the financial handwriting on the wall. People knew this was coming, and did nothing.

  3. gkreahlingmckay says:

    Lavish lifestyles? I am working with a student as my role of mentor to the football team who is stressed to make rent this week – it’s a bit overdue – until his loan check clears. He’s been on pins and needles. I doubt he’s using the loan to buy some expensive furniture. I can’t believe anyone with a pulse in higher education would actually think that – let alone say it. SMH

  4. The way beyond 65 professor may have a point in some cases.

    My experience was as an international student studying in the UK.
    Our international fees were 6x higher than those of home students,
    but home students also received up to a £2,000 bank overdraft
    (per term). Studying in London there were many ways to
    spend that money that did not go directly towards education…
    Many spent their overdraft money on designer clothes, traveling
    & clubbing, only to do the same thing when the next term began.

    On the other hand, during the summers I returned to the states, &
    luckily my fathers employer had a summer hire program, with quite
    brutal 12 hour shifts. Luckily that opportunity allowed me to subsidize
    both my international fees & living costs, and I graduated debt free.

    Today to study the same undergraduate degree has gone from £6,000
    per year to £16,000. Which coincides with university inflation being far
    higher than any other sector. This increase in tuition would make it
    very difficult to even study the same course if I was applying in 2017.

  5. W/r/t #2 I have to wonder if the preference is to similar education levels or similar tribes. Consider legacy kids and the richies that refer to each other as Yale men or such. I suspect there are far more dynasties coalescing rather than simply these individuals are looking for people to talk to. (Certainly I doubt trophy wives are chosen primarily by education level.)

    Do we have any stats on people who choose partners based on education level and filtered for class status *before* entering school? Or people with widely differing backgrounds but similar education levels who went to different higher institutions?

  6. Pingback: On the solstice, dark thoughts for 2018 | Bryan Alexander

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *