50,000 tweets and rising

Today I’ll post my 50,000th tweet.  If I time it right, it’ll be one announcing this post. And more will keep coming.

50,000!  That’s an awful lot of Twittery.  So, at this milestone, with some perspective, I have to wonder: why do I keep using Twitter?

50000 by a_leste

There are plenty of reasons not to.  Some stretch back to the site’s founding out of Odeo’s wreck: the fierce character limits, the ways some people tweet content that doesn’t interest other people, the difficulty in conversing at length or with nuance there.  Other problems have drawn more attention lately: the promotion of emotional content; the prevalence of bots; the successes of trolls and abusers.  In addition there are management problems, such as wildly uneven content and user moderation, a seemingly desperately flailing for growth, and the fact that so much depends on the semi-scrutable thoughts of management.  Meanwhile, some find using Twitter to be infuriating, addictive, or just frustrating.

I appreciate these problems and critiques.  I’ve shared some of them myself.  Yet as a particular user with certain demands and habits, I still find Twitter’s benefits to outweigh its negatives.

First, I make extensive use of Twitter for research.  I follow bright people and key search terms regularly.  My Tweetdeck columns are obsessively curated to bring me news and thoughts from these sources.  Then I push out stories and thoughts myself, seeking feedback.  Sometimes I get it, which helps my work.

Twitter isn’t my only research source by any means.  I have a post coming up about my work routine which will say more.

Tweetdeck 3 column sample

Screenshot of my Tweetdeck today, showing 3 columns.

Second, Twitter remains the best digital way to connect face-to-face events with the broader world.  When I’m on the ground at a conference, say, tracking the event’s Twitter hashtag gives me greater access to what people are thinking about there, as well as responses from around the world.  And when I can’t attend Twitter lets me peep in.

The same is true of digital events.  People in Future Trends Forum sessions like to tweet out the experience.  Elsewhere, and without naming names, I’ve found some webinars have more Twitter activity than on-platform discussion.

No other platform can do this as well as Twitter.  (Some of us talked about doing it on Mastodon, but that didn’t take off.)

Third, Twitter remains a home for interesting digital storytelling work.  You can see this in the ways people construct long threads, using storytelling techniques to keep us reading.  There are also formal storytelling accounts, like the entertaining MicroSFF one.

In addition, plenty of accounts are trying to win attention for themselves by using story.  Twitter remains, in short, a story center.

Fourth, some people use Twitter as a leading communication mechanism.  There are a number of folks who will respond or reach out to me primarily through tweets and DMs.  And many people will share stuff on Twitter that they don’t express via other platforms, or don’t do so for a while.

Fifth, I use Twitter for professional development, like a lot of people do.  I share my questions about writing, researching, speaking, leading workshops, teaching, travel, small businesses, etc., and sometimes get good responses.  I learn, too, by following other people engaged in similar practices.

Sixth, beyond all of this work, I also find entertainment natively on Twitter, the home of Florida Man, the bleak British 1970s horror comedy of Scarfolk, and the grim Werner Twertzog.  I enjoy the Cold War nostalgia and madness of CONELRAD6401240 and Soviet Visuals.  There is the unsprung surrealism of WYR_BOT, Approved News 6, and dril.  And there’s the science-fiction-become-everyday-life inspiration of the International Space Station.

Seventh, I enjoy the short character count constraint.  It’s a fun challenge to pare down a humanist’s predilection for prolixity into a tiny tweet.  Good practice.

And eighth… there’s no replacement, no successor.  I have tried Mastodon, and the results are not inducing me to switch.  The level of engagement I experience is far lower than what I see on Twitter.  It may be that I’ve found the wrong instance, or that it’ll take more time for me to build up a network there – and I’m still trying.  But for now, Twitter remains superior for my needs.  Yammer: I’m not part of any group using that right now.

I still use RSS, although I’m in the first steps of considering new readers beyond Inoreader.  And I admit that I spend less time with it than I used to, since I can get some RSS-like benefits from Twitter.

Compared to other social media, I get far more professional content on Twitter than anywhere else.  There are far more people and more discussions on Facebook, but I haven’t had much luck in the future of education realm.  The largest proportion of conversation is, by far, based on personal and political topics.  Also, Facebook’s blackbox AI shapes my experience for more than I’d like, whereas I have more control in Twitter.  Instagram is similar to Facebook for me, in that I’m struggling to bring it to a professional, rather than personal focus.  LinkedIn is purely professional, but doesn’t offer a lot of exchanges.  Pinterest: I don’t use it much.  Google+ just ceased.

Reddit: I’ve had decent experiences with various boards so far, and might do more there.

It may be that my story is unusual.  I run my own business, rather than working full time for someone else, which means I have to make my connections and do my marketing, so perhaps that need is higher than many other people experience.  My work and my thinking are predicated on connections and conversations with many people, so maybe that leads me to put up with Twitter’s problems beyond a sane tolerance level.

50000 by kittel

I haven’t been teaching with Twitter directly this year, although several students and I follow each other and have tweeted back and forth.  So far my classes have not expressed interest, and I didn’t feel I should haul them into the Twitterverse.  We’ll see if my next classes have similar thoughts.

So: lots of Twitter for me, and more to come.  How about you?

(photos by Diego BIS and Kirk Kittell)

Liked it? Take a second to support Bryan Alexander on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
This entry was posted in digitalstorytelling, technology. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to 50,000 tweets and rising

  1. Phil Katz says:

    Think about the carbon footprint of all your tweets! If this site (http://www.tweetfarts.com/) and my math are correct, you have added a least a kilogram of CO2 to the environment, and that’s just on the production side.

    • Bryan Alexander says:

      First, that’s the best domain name I’ve seen in a while, Phil.
      Second, I suppose I’ll have to keep planting trees.

  2. Joyce O says:

    I am considering leaving Twitter. It is a time sink and I only follow a handful of people and orgs. I the other hand I will be starting a business soon and may need to tweet more because of that. My hands and eyes are suffering from so much computer timeas well there’s got to be a better way!

    • Bryan Alexander says:

      I’m sorry to hear about your hands and eyes, Joyce. I’m not a medical professional, so can’t advise you; have any therapies or assistive technologies helped?

  3. Your last point was interesting. I taught a school communication course for Merrimack last fall, using blogging but not Twitter, and the majority of student evals recommended adding Twitter to the course alongside blogging.

    Conflicted for many of the reasons Terry Anderson noted in https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/327/361

    • Bryan Alexander says:

      Now that’s very interesting. Did they give reasons?
      I wonder how many were already Twitter users.

      • My take on it is that most were not Twitter users…but having been pleasantly surprised by blogging, they were looking for a guided experience using Twitter. This group of students were primarily in their 30’s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *