American tv news stations confronting the terrifying possibility of committing journalism

The New York Times has a fine story about tv “news” that’s good for eliciting both tears and laughter.  It concerns the plight of American cable tv  outfits, who now face a dilemma.  They want to cover the presidential campaign, but really only want to show Trump.  What is one to do?

CNN headlines 2016 June 1

Here’s what CNN.com thinks is most important for you this morning. Yes, they invite you to watch a video of a gorilla hauling around a 3-year-old.

This story offers a nice glimpse into just how bad tv “news” has become.  Actually covering a campaign at a basic level – you know, what we expect journalists to do – has now become a risky move, one well worth avoiding.  Not committing journalism would make all kinds of sense.  After all, the dollars are clear:

Prime-time advertising rates spiked at the major cable news networks in the first quarter of the year, rising 45 percent at CNN and 23 percent at MSNBC, compared with the same period the year before, according to Kantar Media, which tracks ad spending.

The tv people are pretty clear about their professional/existential problem.  For example, “[Bret Baier, the chief political anchor at Fox News] said that producers are ‘really trying to think outside the box’ to balance Mr. Trump’s ubiquity onscreen.”  That’s right, actually reporting on other candidates, like Trump’s November opponent(s), is now “out of the box” thinking.

Similarly, tv “news” outlets are struggling with problems high school newspaper writers solved in 10th grade:

Some network officials concede that Mr. Trump can be an unreliable narrator of his own campaign, reversing himself on policies from one interview to the next. But they also say that Mrs. Clinton — who has been even more reluctant to give interviews to print outlets than to television — is notably less comfortable interacting with the media, sometimes keeping her out of the daily conversation.

Yes, it must be challenging to report on a politician who changes their mind.  Good lord, must a reporter actually – gasp – report?

Similarly, the article invites us to hear the immense challenge of covering another candidate who isn’t frantically calling tv shows on a daily basis.  Must these “news” outlets actually have to do some journalism?  I suppose we are expected to express some sympathy for their struggle, especially in response to bleatings like this:

“There’s always a challenge if you have one candidate who is not very cooperative, and isn’t interested in going appearance for appearance,” said Chuck Todd, the moderator of “Meet the Press” on NBC.

It must be hard to report on a candidate who isn’t the easiest to approach.  Poor, poor babies.

On another level, the dawning recognition that tv “news” has helped make a monster, which I noted in March, seems to be spreading:

In interviews, more than a dozen anchors, executives and news producers displayed admiration for Mr. Trump’s facility with their medium. Some expressed a bit of soul-searching, admitting unease at the unfiltered exposure he has received…

“has received” is a very delicate phrasing.  It’s much more polite than, say, “the unfiltered coverage gleefully festooned upon Trump by these very same anchors, executives, and producers.”

Here is what we have come to expect:

Last week, none of the three major cable news networks — CNN, Fox News, or MSNBC — carried Mrs. Clinton’s speech to a workers’ union in Las Vegas, where she debuted sharp new attack lines against Mr. Trump.

Instead, each chose to broadcast a live feed of an empty podium in North Dakota, on a stage where Mr. Trump was about to speak.

Whatever you think of these candidates and their respective merits (for the record, I’m a Sanders supporter), this kind of coverage is outrageous.

Speaking of what we’ve grown accustomed to expect, here’s another screenshot of CNN.com’s headlines.  It really is a fine mix of crime, Gothic horror, and fear:

CNN headlines 2016 May 29

As I’ve said before, American tv “news” is a disaster.  Until it changes, we have to stop consuming it, and help other people avoid it.  This is a task for educators and our culture.

Previous posts on tv “news”: herehere, here, and here. I have also tagged the lot.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in research topics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to American tv news stations confronting the terrifying possibility of committing journalism

  1. Eric LePage says:

    Capitalism trumps all? I know – ouch. At the end of the day, whatever earns the major news outlets the highest advertising dollar will “earn” the top headlines. I’ve had to search for my news elsewhere as a result, alas – sorry CNN, FOX, et al. You’re right – if more citizens followed suit, the news outlets would have to change their “news reporting” tactics as well.

    Like

  2. Pingback: TV news as a hotline to memory | Bryan Alexander

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s