The CDC links in-person university operations with COVID spread

What does the coronavirus mean for colleges and universities? How did campuses handle this public safety emergency?

I’ve been researching how the pandemic impacts higher education since COVID first appeared in Hubei province.  Part of my work reverses that equation, asking the question: how do campuses impact their communities through their handling of the virus?

CDC logoThis month the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published a devastating answer. They found strong links between large universities conducting in-person operations and massive COVID-19 spikes in surrounding communities.

Let’s take a look at the report, then discuss what it could mean for higher education’s future.

First, for context: the novel coronavirus continues to gnaw at the human race.   There are now 96,877,399 cases worldwide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO); 98,424,940, as per Johns Hopkins.  The virus has killed 2,098,879 (WHO) or 2,113,938 (JHU). (Did we really pass that two million dead milestone without notice?) In the United States, the subject of today’s post, 24,512,618 people have been infected to date, or about 7.5% of the total population.  408,697 have died. These numbers are from the CDC, which has several times admitted they are conservative undercounts.

The numbers seem to be building to some degree.  The University of Washington’s IHME project estimates a worldwide total of 3,349,426 deaths by May 1, 2021.  Several nations have seen nightmarish winter outbreaks controlled, or at least dropping to plateaus, according to 91-DIVOC:

coronavirus cases by nation US _ 2020 Jan 23_91-COVID

In that context, what have American universities been doing, and with what impact?

The CDC team looked at a group of very large universities (those with more than 20,000 students), then checked their operational strategy (in-person versus online) against COVID infections in their host counties during the start of classes.  Their findings are stark:

U.S. counties with large colleges or universities with remote instruction (n = 22) experienced a 17.9% decrease in incidence and university counties with in-person instruction (n = 79) experienced a 56% increase in incidence, comparing the 21-day periods before and after classes started…

COVID-19 incidence, hotspot occurrence, COVID-19-related testing, and test positivity increased in university counties with in-person instruction. [emphases added]

In other words, if a large university shifted education online last fall, its county saw a drop in COVID cases. If, in contrast, the university opened its doors and hosted face to face activities, infections spiked upwards.

Here’s a visualization of the data from the Chronicle of Higher Ed:

coronavirus cases university counties CDC 2021 Jan_Chronicle of Higher Ed

How do we interpret this research?

On the one hand, we can react to the report with a great deal of caution. The CDC held back from casting blame directing, preferring to show correlation rather than causation, although the case for causation looks pretty clear.  The closest they get to casting aspersions is this line: “the concurrent increases in percentage positivity and in incidence in these counties suggest that higher levels of transmission, in addition to increased case discovery, occurred in these communities.”

We can also bear in mind that this research describes only one segment of American academia, the very large campuses with the capacity for on-site, in-person education. That’s just 101 institutions, albeit huge ones, out of circa 4,400. And we can recall that the report addresses only the start of the semester (“these results might not be generalizable to counties with smaller colleges and universities”).  It looks like a learning curve was – appropriately – involved. We can also add that the mechanism of infection does not seem to be classrooms, but housing, both on- and off-campus (“Congregate living settings at colleges and universities were linked to transmissions”).

On the other hand, it looks like the decision to hold in-person education led straight to spreading COVID in these universities’ communities. That means the face-to-face experience yielded stress, illness, and likely some deaths in surrounding populations.   The choice to do so furthered the pandemic’s spread and flew in the face of public health. Put that way, the findings are damning, at least for those 79 campuses and their decision-makers.

What do we do with this report?

The CDC offers some advice for higher ed. Lisa Barrios, one of the researchers told the Chronicle of Higher Ed that “Colleges and universities with in-person classes should be considering ways that they can increase their mitigation efforts.” The report goes into more detail:

Testing students for COVID-19 when they return to campus and throughout the semester might be an effective strategy to rapidly identify and isolate new cases to interrupt and reduce further transmissions… Colleges and universities should work to achieve greater adherence to the recommended use of masks, hand hygiene, social distancing, and COVID-19 surveillance among students… including those who are exposed, symptomatic, and asymptomatic…

College and university administrators should work with local decision-makers and public health officials to strengthen community mitigation…

They also add this point about inequalities:

Increasing testing capacity and engaging in other COVID-19 mitigation strategies might be especially important for colleges and universities in areas where transmission from students into the broader community could exacerbate existing disparities, including access to and utilization of health care, as well as the disproportionate morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 among populations with prevalent underlying conditions associated with more severe outcomes following infection.

Curiously, the CDC does not advocate for online instruction.  Which is strange, since this report makes that strategy abundantly appealing from a, well, disease control perspective.

We may also have to do some reputational damage control. If Americans think some universities – and these tend to be ones that make impressions – have knowingly caused illness, injury, and even death among their neighbors, it won’t just be hard right Republicans who look upon academia with dismay. I’ve written about this reputation crisis previously.

In self-defense, we may have to point to the work some research universities did to speed the vaccine, the development of which is surely a triumph.  We can also bet that this story doesn’t get much traction. It’s dry stuff, statistics and science, things which most media outlets struggle to convey. The CDC report also competes with many other stories, including the demise of the Trump administration and the rise of the Biden. In other words, we can hope that word of academia’s role in worsening the pandemic doesn’t spread – unlike the virus did, in 79 American counties.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support Bryan Alexander on Patreon!
This entry was posted in coronavirus. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The CDC links in-person university operations with COVID spread

  1. Glen McGhee, FHEAP says:

    The Harris Poll has a recent survey of post-Covid opinions about student loan debt that reveal deep ambivalence about the value and relevance of post-Covid higher education. In over 20 years, I’ve never seen such an outcry as this. It breaks my heart.

    “There is notable pessimism regarding the long-term value of college degrees, too. Nearly half of all student loan debtors (46%) agree that their university degree will be worthless to employers before they retire.”
    Such an extreme expression of pain and suffering is related to the deep woundedness of those caught between the demands of culture (cultural norms) and the stark economic reality facing us all.

    Buyer’s remorse
    https://theharrispoll.com/student-debt-reform/
    Student loan debtors would redo much of their college experience because of the student debt they have today. Additionally, they view their degrees as less valuable both personally and financially.
    Just over half (52%) of debtors agree they **regret** attending college in general because of the student loan debt they have today. If they could do it all over over, half of student loan debtors say they would have chosen a less expensive college (57%), chosen a different major (56%), or **not** attended college at all (52%) because of their current student loan debt.
    Nearly two-thirds (64%) of student loan debtors view their college degree(s) as less personally valuable than they did when they started college, and 60% of student loan debtors say their degree is **not** worth the amount of student loan debt they’ve taken on.//

  2. Michael Flood says:

    My family has been very cautious with work and school (K-12 in our case) remote since the start of the pandemic. We even stopped ordering pizza when we saw the local pizza place employees relax their precautions. So we have faced a tough choice. Despite the school district’s closure being repeatedly extended and still ongoing, tomorrow our eldest is supposed to go into school to take the PSAT. An opportunity that will impact the pathway to college and which I value. But we are still *routinely* getting messages from the school about people at the school being diagnosed positive (even with all students remote…).

    Of course they will temperature check, our student will wear a mask and knows to be very cautious. Is it safe enough? Will the added stress impact test performance? The data from this study and our local experience has me very concerned, but we value education very highly. I wonder about families who do not and whether turnout for an in-person PSAT when local rates are high at a school that is sending positive diagnosis notifications routinely will be low.

  3. Glen McGhee, FHEAP says:

    The point about PSAT/SAT that people are missing is that ultimately the SCHOOLS are the consumers of test results. It’s NOT for the benefit of students, but for the convenience of the schools that require or don’t require test results. But now the schools are backing out, and the College Board is struggling to stay alive.
    If, in the next few years, what will you remember? That someone in your family died from Covid picked up at a test center, after the schools and the rest of us have forgotten what standardized testing was?

Leave a Reply to Glen McGhee, FHEAP Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.